Thousands of parents cry foul as schools allegedly demand bribe for Grade 10 placement. Many families feel abandoned by a placement system that offers no clear answers or accountability.
Parents move daily from school to school hoping to correct placement mistakes affecting their children’s academic futures. Most report closed gates, tight security, and administrators who refuse to hear complaints.
Several parents say preferred schools turn them away immediately without explanations or written guidance. Others receive vague assurances about future phone calls that never happen.
Parents complain that the placement system lacks a clear appeal process that ordinary people can understand. Confusion grows because officials share conflicting instructions at different schools.
The lack of official communication increases panic as the opening day draws closer each week. Parents fear delays will disrupt learning and damage children’s confidence early.
Some parents worry their children may miss the entire academic year if delays continue. They see no emergency plan from authorities to handle unresolved cases quickly.
Families report emotional stress affecting both parents and learners who wait helplessly at home. Children keep asking questions that parents cannot answer honestly.
Learners placed far from home spark outrage
Many parents complain that officials sent their children to schools far from their home counties. Some learners received placements in distant day schools despite choosing nearby options.
Parents argue these decisions ignore transport costs, safety risks, and family responsibilities. They say officials failed to consider daily realities faced by working families.
One Nairobi parent said officials sent their child to a school in Siaya County without consultation. The parent explained daily travel or relocation would remain impossible under their circumstances.
Families say sudden relocation disrupts jobs, housing plans, and support systems built over years. Many add that boarding costs never featured in their original financial planning.
Several parents claim officials ignored the school choices submitted during the application process. They feel punished despite following every instruction provided by the ministry.
Long distances expose learners to fatigue, insecurity, and emotional strain, according to parents. Younger learners struggle more because they depend heavily on family support.
Parents insist proximity must guide placements under the Competency Based Education system. They argue access to education requires practical decisions, not automated outcomes only.
Bribery allegations deepen mistrust and anger
Claims of bribery have worsened anger surrounding the Grade 10 placement exercise nationwide. Several parents allege intermediaries demanded money to secure slots in popular schools.
Parents report demands ranging between Ksh100,000 and Ksh150,000 per learner. They describe these demands as illegal, exploitative, and morally unacceptable.
One parent said two different individuals quoted different prices for the same school. Another parent claimed an intermediary shared contacts to continue negotiations privately.
Parents say desperation pushes families into considering actions they would normally reject. Many had prepared money only for official school fees.
They argue bribery rewards wealth and connections instead of merit and fairness. Honest families feel punished for refusing to pay illegal charges.
The allegations raise serious questions about integrity among some school administrators. Parents believe corruption has quietly entered the placement process.
Many parents fear reporting such cases because retaliation against learners seems possible. Silence protects wrongdoers and allows corruption to spread further.
Ministry response and limits of the review process
The Ministry of Education acknowledges receiving many complaints about Grade 10 placements. Education Cabinet Secretary Julius Ogamba announced a second review phase to address concerns.
The second review started on January 6 and will run for four days. Officials say the window targets genuine placement errors and special hardship cases.
Learners will begin reporting to senior schools on January 12 under the new curriculum. Parents worry the timeline leaves little room for unresolved disputes.
The ministry says only parents with verifiable reasons qualify for placement changes. Officials argue schools must manage limited space responsibly and fairly.
Parents say these conditions exclude many legitimate cases facing real hardship. They complain that criteria remain unclear and inconsistently applied.
Many parents say the review process lacks transparency and clear instructions. They do not know where or how to submit complaints properly.
Officials say they completed the first revision on December 29 and released joining instructions. Parents argue these announcements ignore thousands of unresolved placement cases.
About The Author
